![miriam guso miriam guso](https://media.laregione.ch/files/domains/laregione.ch/images/4bk4/-circolo-di-capriasca-tre-municipi-han-giurato-9s0l.jpg)
Gourtsoyiannis N Papanikolaou N Grammatikakis J Maris T Prassopoulos P MR enteroclysis protocol optimization: comparison between 3D FLASH with fat saturation after intravenous gadolinium injection and true FISP sequences Eur Radiol 2001 11 908 13 11419161Ĩ. Rollandi GA Martinoli C Conzi R Cittadini G Molinari F Bertolotto M Talenti A Curone P Magnetic resonance imaging of the small intestine and colon in Crohn’s disease Radiol Med 1996 91 81 85 8614737ħ. Schreyer GA Menzel C Friedrich C Poschenrieder F Egger L Dornia C Schill G Dendl ML Schacherer D Girlich C Jung ME Comparison of high-resolution ultrasound and MR-enterography in patients with inflammatory bowel disease World J Gastroenterol 21025 21448353Ħ.
![miriam guso miriam guso](https://www.afaxirinacs.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/anemonayhulda-1024x1024.png)
Zerem E Comment on the article about the evaluation of transabdominal ultrasonography performed by a gastroenterologist in his office: why should not all clinicians use transabdominal ultrasonography on a routine basis? J Clin Gastroenterol 2011 45 45766ĥ. Al-Bawardy B Hansel SL Fidler JL Barlow JM Bruining DH Endoscopic and radiographic assessment of Crohn’s disease Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2017 46 48411Ĥ. Emami MH Behbahan IS Zade HD Daneshgar H New interpretation for diagnostic yield of ileoscopy: A prospective study and a brief review J Res Med Sci 2009 14 12877ģ. Kilcoyne A Kaplan JL Gee MS Inflammatory bowel disease imaging: Current practice and future directions World J Gastroenterol 2016 22 91637Ģ. In the diagnosis of abscess, there was no significant difference between the results obtained by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, while in fistula and lymphadenopathy there was a significant difference.Conclusion:Conventional ultrasound is a good orientation method in the initial evaluation of patients with Crohn’s disease, while contrast enhanced MR enterography provides an excellent assessment for disease activity as well as the complications that accompany it.
![miriam guso miriam guso](https://dsmorus.cl/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Mirian.jpg)
The study found that the sensitivity for MR enterography for bowel wall thickening was 97.8%, and the specificity was 70%, while the sensitivity for ultrasound for the bowel wall thickening was 51% and the specificity was 100%. Four parameters characterizing the disease itself were analyzed: bowel wall thickening, presence of abscess, fistula and lymphadenopathy.Results:Comparing the accuracy of the results of ultrasound findings and findings of MR enterography, it was found that there is a significant difference in the results obtained.
![miriam guso miriam guso](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2020/03/Miriam-Brooks-Article-202003171327.jpg)
They were subsequently endoscopically examined or treated surgically, which was taken as a reference. Introduction:The small intestine is a challenging organ for clinical and radiological evaluation, and by introducing imaging radiological techniques, not significantly disturbing the comfort and safety of patients, it attempts to obtain adequate diagnosis and valuable information.Aim:The research was conducted with the aim of checking the comparability and potential of diagnostic modality of ultrasound and dynamic contrast enhanced MR Enterography (DCE-MR) in patients with Crohn’s disease.Methods:55 patients were examined prospectively, and ultrasound examination of the abdomen was performed for all patients before the MR enterography.